Home/news/Arkansas AG sues Kalshi and VGW over alleged illegal gambling
news
Arkansas AG sues Kalshi and VGW over alleged illegal gambling
Payments High Risk
7 Nov 2026 · 1 min read
Arkansas Attorney General Tim Griffin filed lawsuits against Kalshi and Virtual Gaming Worlds (VGW) on November 4, saying both companies offered gambling services in the state without the required licences. For high-risk operators, the case is a familiar one: if the product looks like gambling, has gambling-style controls, and is marketed to local consumers, the label on the homepage may not carry much weight.
Griffin filed the Kalshi case in Independence County Circuit Court and the VGW case in White County Circuit Court. In both complaints, he seeks restitution for affected customers, civil penalties and unpaid taxes, plus court orders preventing the companies from commercialising their products in Arkansas.
In the Kalshi lawsuit, Griffin argues that the company’s event contracts are gambling rather than financial prediction products. He points to features such as self-exclusion options, deposit limits and problem-gambling resources, saying those are typically associated with gambling operators.
The attorney general also flags Kalshi’s minimum age of 18, noting that Arkansas requires customers to be at least 21 to participate in casino gaming and sports wagering. That mismatch is the sort of detail regulators like to use when they want to show a product is being treated as gambling in practice, not just in argument.
The VGW complaint targets its sweepstakes platforms, including Chumba Casino, LuckyLand Casino, LuckyLand Slots and Global Poker. According to the filing, customers buy Gold Coins with real money and receive Sweeps Coins as a bonus; those can be used to play casino-style games, with winnings potentially redeemable for cash.
VGW says it is an interactive entertainment company and denies operating a gambling business, but Griffin says Arkansas’s review found the model amounted to gambling under state law. In September, VGW agreed to pay US$8m to settle a case with the New York Attorney General after a cease-and-desist letter over its sweepstakes casino operations; the payment covered disgorgement, penalties and costs.