Sign up
Subscribe
Home / news / Ontario Online Poker Stays Ring-Fenced After Supreme Court Rejects Cross-Border Liquidity
news

Ontario Online Poker Stays Ring-Fenced After Supreme Court Rejects Cross-Border Liquidity

Ontario Online Poker Stays Ring-Fenced After Supreme Court Rejects Cross-Border Liquidity

Ontario’s regulated online poker market is stuck with a smaller player pool after the Supreme Court of Canada ruled against sharing liquidity across provincial borders. For operators, that means thinner prize pools, fewer formats, and a harder sell versus offshore poker rooms that can simply aggregate more players.

  1. NSUS Group, the parent company behind GGPoker, said Ontario’s online poker scene is in the doldrums after the court’s decision. Sarne Lightman told Casino.org that Ontario has been one of the more successful regulated iGaming markets in North America, but poker remains an outlier because it needs a critical mass of players at the same time.
  2. The practical issue is shared liquidity. In poker, the prize pool depends on how many players are in the same game, unlike online casino products, where payouts are tied to the RTP (return to player). Lightman said the small liquidity in Ontario has sharply reduced tournament prize pools, and some game types and blind levels are no longer being offered.
  3. If the court had allowed cross-border pooling, provinces that support online poker, specifically Alberta, could have joined their player pools and prizes into a single market. The article says that would have helped revive an industry widely described as moribund and waning.
  4. The same model already exists in the United States through the Multi-State Internet Gaming Agreement, which links Delaware, Michigan, Nevada, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia. The idea is simple: more jurisdictions, more players, bigger pools. Poker operators know the rest of the story.
  5. Ontario poker also has to compete with offshore online poker platforms, which can bring together larger player bases and offer better prize conditions because of their scale. Without shared liquidity, the local market is left trying to fight that with a smaller pool and fewer tables, which is not exactly a luxury setup.

For PSPs, acquirers, and banks looking at high-risk gaming, the takeaway is straightforward: Ontario’s regulated poker market has a regulatory ceiling that slots and sports betting do not face in the same way. Poker needs liquidity, and the Supreme Court just made clear that Ontario will not get it from across provincial borders for now.

Weekly high-risk digest

Regulation, sanctions and payment news across your verticals — once a week, free.

Please check your inbox and click the link to confirm your subscription.

Please enter a valid email address!