Premier League bans betting sponsors on front-of-shirt slots from 2026/27
The Premier League has started enforcing a ban on betting-company logos in the main front-of-shirt sponsor position, after clubs approved the rule in April 2023 and agreed to a three-year transition period. For PSPs and merchants in high-risk verticals, the important bit is simple: one of the most visible premium inventory slots in English football is gone, and clubs are now shifting betting spend into other properties.
- The ban took effect on Friday, 21/8, and applies to the 2026/2027 season. It covers only the front, or “master,” position on match shirts. Betting brands can still appear on sleeves, the back of shirts, shorts, and stadium inventory.
- The financial hit could be material. According to Exame, citing a club executive in The Guardian, total lost shirt-sponsorship revenue could reach £80 mi in the current season, equal to R$ 544,8 mi. The clubs most exposed are said to be Bournemouth, Brentford, Everton, and West Ham.
- Before the change, 11 of the 20 Premier League clubs had betting companies as their main shirt sponsor. That concentration matters: the rule does not shut betting out of the league, but it does remove the clearest “top-of-shirt” signal that many operators used for mass visibility.
- Clubs are already replacing that inventory elsewhere. Tottenham signed a betting deal for the main training-kit slot, plus LED boards, digital activations, pre-match sports equipment, and stadium screens. Manchester United announced a training-kit master sponsorship valued at £20 million per season, covering both the men’s and women’s teams at Carrington; it was described as the largest training-kit sponsorship in world football. United had been without a sponsor in that category since its Tezos partnership ended in June 2025.
- In the current season, half of Premier League clubs still have some kind of betting partnership, but only two keep exposure on the shirt itself: Everton and Aston Villa, both on the sleeves. Arsenal, Bournemouth, Brentford, Brighton, Chelsea, Ipswich Town, and Newcastle United have deals tied to social media or stadium properties.
For high-risk payment teams, the practical takeaway is that sponsorship demand from betting brands is not disappearing; it is moving into lower-visibility, multi-property packages. That usually means more fragmented deal structures, more negotiating points, and less reliance on a single shirt slot to carry the commercial relationship.
Weekly high-risk digest
Regulation, sanctions and payment news across your verticals — once a week, free.
Please check your inbox and click the link to confirm your subscription.
Please enter a valid email address!